Eddie Doc

approvedunreviewed

by Volodymyr Pavlyshyn

Map an editor's PDF annotations back onto your AsciiDoc source as navigable, resolvable review items.

↓ 27 downloadsUpdated 6d agoMIT

Eddie Doc — AsciiDoc PDF Review

You write a book in AsciiDoc, generate a PDF, and hand it to an editor. The editor sends back an annotated PDF — highlights, strikethroughs, sticky-note comments, rewrite requests. Reconciling those marks against the original .adoc by hand is slow and error-prone.

Eddie Doc reads the annotated PDF, recovers the text under each annotation, and maps every mark back to the exact line in your .adoc source. Annotations become navigable, resolvable review items right where you write.

Where it runs

Eddie Doc is available in two places, plus a command-line tool. They share one core and one on-disk review format, so a review started in one can be continued in another.

VS Code extensionObsidian plugin
StatusReleased (Marketplace)1.4.0, on GitHub; BRAT-installable. Tested on desktop Obsidian and tried on a phone
Where marks showActivity-bar tree, inline decorations, Problems panel, gutter threadsOne review panel, line highlights, gutter badges, hover
Acting on a markLightbulb quick fixes"Apply to the source" buttons in the panel
Default review folder.eddieEddie Reviews (visible, so it syncs)
MobileNoYes, same code (tried on a phone by hand; not measured)
Semantic fallback (Ollama)YesDesktop only
Review formatv3 sidecarv3 sidecar, the same files

The review file both hosts write is described in the review sidecar section and in docs/FORMAT.md.

Privacy, network use and file access

Everything runs locally. Eddie Doc has no telemetry, no analytics, no accounts and no ads, and loads no remote code.

  • Network: only the optional semantic-matching fallback, off by default and unavailable on mobile. When enabled, it sends source paragraphs and annotation text to the Ollama URL you set (by default http://localhost:11434, your own machine) to compute embeddings, and to no other address.
  • Files: it reads your .adoc and PDFs and writes its review files inside the workspace or vault. In Obsidian it writes only to the review folder and to a manuscript it was asked to anchor or edit; copying a PDF in from outside the vault happens only through a file picker you operate, on desktop.
  • Your text: // eddie:<id> anchor comments are added to the .adoc when a PDF is mapped (setting Anchor annotations when mapping). They never render and Remove source anchors takes them out. Suggested edits are applied only when you press the button, as one undoable change.

Eddie Doc for VS Code

What it does

  • Extracts highlights, strikethroughs, underlines, sticky-note comments, and caret/insert marks from the PDF (via pdfjs), including the comment body and author.
  • Maps each annotation to a source line using fuzzy text matching that strips AsciiDoc syntax first, so a highlighted phrase lines up with your markup-laden source. Works with Unicode text (incl. Cyrillic).
  • Leads with the editor's query number. When a comment carries a reference like [12], [C7] or [AU 3] , that number is hoisted to the front of every label — tree row, inline marker, hover, comment thread, Problems entry, report — because it is how the remark gets discussed, and a trailing [12] was the first thing lost when a label was truncated. The comment is stored exactly as the editor wrote it; only the display moves the number.
  • Shows annotations four ways:
    • an activity-bar tree grouped into Open / Unmatched / Resolved,
    • inline decorations on the affected source lines with a hover showing the comment and a Mark resolved link,
    • Problems-panel diagnostics for a flat, filterable overview,
    • jump commands to move between annotated lines.
  • Acts via lightbulb Quick Fixes on an annotated line — all explicit and undoable, nothing runs automatically:
    • Delete struck text — character-precise: removes exactly the struck words (aligned back through AsciiDoc markup), not the whole line,
    • Replace struck / highlighted text… — opens an input prefilled with the editor's suggestion and applies it to the exact marked range,
    • Insert text at mark… — inserts at the caret's exact character offset,
    • Insert editor note as comment — pulls the editor's remark into the source as a removable // ✎ … AsciiDoc comment right above the line,
    • Mark resolved / open, plus a whole-line Delete fallback.
  • Tracks resolution state and manual re-links in diffable sidecars, kept out of the manuscript folder in a review folder of their own (.eddie/).

The workflow is navigate + review, edit by hand — Eddie Doc never rewrites your prose automatically. It points you at the right line and remembers what you've handled.

It is built for a real editing process: several rounds of edits, each of which can come back as more than one annotated PDF from more than one place. See Rounds and mappings.

Usage

  1. Open the .adoc you're reviewing.
  2. Run Eddie Doc: Open PDF Review for AsciiDoc (command palette, the editor-title comment icon, or the Open PDF Review button in the Eddie Doc sidebar). Pick the annotated PDF — a sibling *.pdf / *.annotated.pdf is offered by default.
  3. Annotations appear in the Eddie Doc sidebar and as inline markers.
    • Click an item to jump to its source line.
    • Hover a marked line to read the comment and mark it resolved.
    • An annotation whose text couldn't be located lands under Unmatched — put your cursor on the right line and run Re-link to Current Cursor Line, or clear the whole pile at once with the Triage button on the Unmatched group: it walks each item with a pre-ranked shortlist of candidate lines so you link or skip them in a single keyboard pass.
  4. Edit your .adoc, then run Re-map Annotations to re-check positions against the edited source. Resolution state is preserved across re-maps.
  5. When the next round comes back, run Start New Review Round and pick the new PDF. Your resolved state, notes and replies carry across to it.

Commands

CommandWhat
Eddie Doc: Open PDF Review for AsciiDocPick an annotated PDF and map it. Once the document has history, it asks which round the marks belong to
Eddie Doc: Start New Review Round…Map a PDF as the next round (rev-N+1), carrying state forward
Eddie Doc: Add Annotated PDF to Current Round…A second (third…) editor's PDF for the round already in progress, as its own mapping
Eddie Doc: Add PDFs to This Mapping…Continue a mapping: append the marks from one or more further PDFs to its list. Marks it already has are skipped
Eddie Doc: Merge Mappings into This One…Fold other mappings of the document into this one, keeping their resolved state, notes and replies
Eddie Doc: Switch Round / MappingShow a different round or a different editor's marks
Eddie Doc: Edit Round Details…Set the round label, date, origin, reviewer, kind of review and kind of PDF
Eddie Doc: Remove This Mapping…Delete one mapping's sidecar; the manuscript and PDF are untouched
Eddie Doc: Re-map AnnotationsRe-run matching against current source, for every round of the document
Eddie Doc: Next / Previous AnnotationJump between annotated lines
Eddie Doc: Toggle ResolvedMark an item done / open
Eddie Doc: Re-link to Current Cursor LineOverride the match for an item
Eddie Doc: Triage Unmatched AnnotationsWalk every unmatched item, each with a ranked shortlist of candidate lines, and link or skip in one pass
Eddie Doc: Export Review ReportWrite the round as a Markdown report to send back to your editor
Eddie Doc: Open Review FolderReveal this document's folder in the review tree
Eddie Doc: Move Reviews into Review Folder…Relocate sidecars that still sit beside the manuscript

Settings

SettingDefaultMeaning
eddieDoc.reviewFolder.eddieFolder holding all review files. Relative to the workspace root; empty string keeps the old layout (sidecar beside the .adoc).
eddieDoc.importPdfsfalseCopy each annotated PDF into its round's pdf/ folder so the round is self-contained.
eddieDoc.stampOutputreviewFolderWhere Stamp Reviewed PDF writes: the round's pdf/ folder, or beside the clean render.
eddieDoc.reportOutputreviewFolderWhere Export Review Report writes: the round's folder, or beside the .adoc.
eddieDoc.matchThreshold0.5Minimum similarity (0–1) to auto-link; below this an item is Unmatched.
eddieDoc.highConfidence0.75Score at/above which a link is trusted; below it the item lands in Needs review.
eddieDoc.showResolvedtrueShow resolved items in the tree and as decorations.
eddieDoc.autoAnchortrueWrite invisible // eddie:<id> markers into the source as soon as a PDF is mapped, so marks are bound to paragraphs instead of line numbers. Off anchors only when you run the command.
eddieDoc.expandThreadsfalseOpen every unanswered thread as the document opens. Off keeps the prose readable — open one thread at a time from the gutter icon.
eddieDoc.inlineMarkerstrueAppend ✎ <kind> at the end of each annotated line. Turn it off if you write with word wrap on and dislike the paragraph re-wrapping around the marker; the line highlight, ruler mark and hover stay.
eddieDoc.lexicalFallbacktrueRescue unmatched items via built-in character-trigram similarity (no setup needed).
eddieDoc.lexicalThreshold0.6Minimum trigram-containment score for a lexical rescue.
eddieDoc.semanticFallbackfalseRescue unmatched items via a local embedding model served by Ollama.
eddieDoc.ollamaUrl / eddieDoc.embedModel / eddieDoc.semanticThreshold—Where and how the semantic fallback embeds.

Rounds and mappings

Editing is iterative. A chapter goes out, comes back marked up, gets rewritten, goes out again — and a single round often comes back from several places at once: a copy editor at the publisher, a technical reviewer, a proofreader.

Eddie Doc models exactly that, with two words:

  • a revision (round) — rev-1, rev-2, … — is one pass over the manuscript;
  • a mapping is one annotated PDF matched onto the source. A round holds as many mappings as it got PDFs.

Each mapping is one sidecar file with its own review state, so two editors' marks on the same paragraph never overwrite each other. The sidebar shows one mapping at a time; a Rounds group at the bottom of the tree lists the others, and the status bar always says which one you're looking at (chapter-01 ⇄ r2 · Acme Editorial).

Setting up a project

Nothing to set up: the defaults do the right thing. The first PDF you open becomes rev-1 with no questions asked, and every file Eddie Doc writes goes under .eddie/ at your workspace root. The next section is the full picture of what lands where.

Running a round

  1. First PDF for a chapter — Open PDF Review. It becomes rev-1.
  2. Another editor's PDF for the same round — Add Annotated PDF to Current Round. It joins rev-1 as a second mapping; you're asked where it came from so the two are told apart in the sidebar.
  3. The next round — Start New Review Round. It becomes rev-2, and your resolved state, notes and replies carry over automatically: annotation ids change with every PDF export, so Eddie Doc reattaches state by annotation content (kind, author, comment, marked text). Where the previous round had several mappings, it carries from the one with the same origin — the same editor's earlier pass — falling back to that round's most recent mapping.
  4. Moving between them — click a row in the tree's Rounds group, or run Switch Round / Mapping.

Open PDF Review on a document that already has history asks which round the PDF belongs to — or which mapping to add it to — so you can also use it for every case here.

Continuing and merging

Separate mappings keep editors apart; sometimes you would rather work through everything as one numbered list.

  • Add PDFs to This Mapping appends further PDFs' marks to an existing mapping. Use it when the editor sends the chapter again with more marks on it — only the marks that are new get added — or when a second editor marked up their own copy of the same pass. You're asked whose marks each file holds, so marks from a PDF that names nobody still get initials. You can pick several PDFs at once.
  • Merge Mappings into This One folds other mappings of the same document into the one you choose. Every mark moves across with what you did to it — resolved, notes, replies, hand-made links and anchors. A remark both mappings hold is kept once, with both copies' state combined. The merged mappings' sidecars are then deleted; their PDFs and reports are left alone.

Either way, Preview in PDF opens the PDF each mark actually came from.

Numbered remarks

Every mark is numbered and labelled with the initials of whoever made it: #3 VP, #12 MR [C7] (the editor's own query number, when they wrote one, stays beside it). The label leads the sidebar, the hover, the comment thread, the Problems panel and the report, and is written into stamped PDFs so the editor can quote it back.

Numbers are assigned once and never move. Re-mapping, editing and adding PDFs leave them where they are; new marks continue after the highest number, and merged mappings are numbered after the target's own. A new round starts again at #1. Initials come from the PDF's author field. When that is empty or a placeholder such as Editor, they come from the reviewer or origin recorded for the PDF or mapping instead, and fill in as soon as you set one in Edit Round Details.

Metadata each mapping keeps

Edit Round Details fills in what the files record about themselves — visible in the tree tooltip, the report, and to any tool reading the sidecar:

FieldWhat it's for
Round label / received date / noteNaming and dating the pass ("Copyedit, received 2026-07-02")
From (origin)The publisher, agency or site the marks came from — also what carry-over matches on
ReviewerThe person, when different from the origin
Kind of reviewcopyedit, proofread, developmental, technical, legal
Kind of PDFannotated, proof, clean, stamped — a round involves several PDFs of the same chapter and only an annotated one carries marks

Intermediate PDFs

Two settings decide whether generated and incoming PDFs land in the review folder or beside the manuscript:

  • eddieDoc.importPdfs (default off) — copy each annotated PDF into .eddie/…/rev-N/pdf/ as it is mapped. Turn it on when PDFs arrive by email and live in a download folder that gets cleared: the round then stays readable (and previewable) forever. The sidecar records where the copy came from.
  • eddieDoc.stampOutput (default reviewFolder) — Stamp Reviewed PDF writes <name>.reviewed.pdf into the round's pdf/ folder rather than next to your clean render. The clean render is never modified either way, so the file you deliver cannot pick up review markup by accident.

Coming from an earlier version

Sidecars already sitting next to your .adoc files keep working exactly as before — they load as rev-1 and are upgraded in place on the next write. Nothing moves until you run Move Reviews into Review Folder, which shows you every from → to before touching anything, rewrites each file at its new location (so the relative paths inside stay correct) and leaves the manuscript alone.

File structure

Two rules govern everything below: the manuscript folder only ever holds your manuscript, and every review file says what it is, so the structure is a convenience rather than something you have to keep in sync.

The review folder

book/                                   ← your repository
├── manuscript/                         ← your deliverable. Eddie Doc never writes here
│   ├── chapter-01.adoc
│   ├── chapter-02.adoc
│   └── part-2/
│       └── chapter-07.adoc
│
├── .eddie/                             ← eddieDoc.reviewFolder (default ".eddie")
│   ├── manuscript/                     ← mirrors the manuscript tree exactly
│   │   ├── chapter-01/                 ← one folder per source document
│   │   │   ├── rev-1/                  ← round 1
│   │   │   │   ├── acme-copyedit.review.json    the mapping (see below)
│   │   │   │   ├── acme-copyedit.review.md      exported report
│   │   │   │   └── pdf/
│   │   │   │       ├── acme-copyedit.pdf        imported annotated PDF
│   │   │   │       └── chapter-01.reviewed.pdf  stamped output
│   │   │   └── rev-2/                  ← round 2
│   │   │       ├── acme-copyedit.review.json    same editor, next round
│   │   │       └── beta-proofread.review.json   second editor, same round
│   │   └── chapter-02/
│   │       └── rev-1/ …
│   └── manuscript/part-2/
│       └── chapter-07/
│           └── rev-1/ …
│
└── build/                              ← your asciidoctor-pdf output, untouched
    └── chapter-01.pdf
LevelWhat it isNamed after
.eddie/Everything Eddie Doc produceseddieDoc.reviewFolder
.eddie/<path>/<stem>/One source documentits path under the workspace root, so two chapter-01.adoc in different folders never collide
…/rev-N/One editing roundthe round number, counted from 1
…/rev-N/<id>.review.jsonOne mapping — one annotated PDF matched onto the sourcethe PDF's file name, slugged (Acme Copyedit.annotated.pdf → acme-copyedit)
…/rev-N/<id>.review.mdThat mapping's exported reportits mapping
…/rev-N/pdf/Imported annotated PDFs and stamped output—

Two PDFs whose names slug identically inside one round get -2, -3 suffixes rather than overwriting each other. Nothing is ever written outside the review folder except by the commands that explicitly edit your source (Anchor Annotations in Source, the Quick Fixes).

What each file is for

FileWritten byLife cycle
<id>.review.jsonEvery review actionThe review. Editor's marks, where each lands in the source, and your resolved state, notes and replies. Commit it.
<id>.review.mdExport Review ReportA snapshot to send back to that editor. Regenerate any time; safe to delete.
pdf/<id>.pdfOpen PDF Review with eddieDoc.importPdfs onA copy of what the editor sent, kept so the round survives a cleared download folder.
pdf/<name>.reviewed.pdfStamp Reviewed PDFA fresh render with the marks and replies written back in. Regenerated from source each time.

What to commit

Commit .eddie/. The sidecars are the review: they diff cleanly, every path inside them is relative, and a clone on another machine works unchanged. Losing them loses which marks you've handled.

If you'd rather not carry PDFs in git, ignore only those:

.eddie/**/pdf/

Reports are cheap to regenerate, so ignoring .eddie/**/*.review.md is also reasonable. Never ignore *.review.json.

Choosing a different layout

eddieDoc.reviewFolder takes a relative path (resolved against the workspace root), an absolute path, or an empty string:

ValueResult
.eddie (default).eddie/… at the workspace root, tree mirrored
reviewsSame, in a visible folder
../book-reviewsBeside the repository — for keeping reviews out of the manuscript repo entirely
/Users/me/reviewsAn absolute location shared by several projects
"" (empty)Legacy layout: <file>.review.json beside each .adoc. Rounds after the first are disambiguated by name (chapter-01.rev-2-beta.review.json), since there is no folder to put them in.

With no folder open (a single .adoc in a window), .eddie/ is created next to that file.

Finding things without the folder structure

The layout is for humans. Tools don't need it: each sidecar records its own revision, mapping, source path and PDF path, so a consumer reconstructs the full history from the files alone.

# every mapping in the project, newest round last
ls .eddie/**/rev-*/*.review.json

# which source, round and editor a given file describes
jq '{source: .source.path, round: .revision.ordinal, from: .mapping.origin}' \
  .eddie/manuscript/chapter-01/rev-2/acme-copyedit.review.json

Moving a sidecar to another folder keeps it valid as long as the relative paths inside it still resolve; Eddie Doc rewrites those for you when Move Reviews into Review Folder relocates a file.

How mapping works

PDF text-markup annotations carry quadPoints — per-line rectangles over the marked text. Eddie Doc intersects those with the positioned text of each page to recover the words under the mark (sticky notes, which have no anchored text, use the nearest line to their icon). Both the recovered text and every source line are normalized — AsciiDoc delimiters, roles, macros and inline markers stripped, lowercased, punctuation removed — then compared with a blended Sørensen–Dice (bigram) + token-overlap score over a sliding window of source lines. The best span above the threshold wins.

Because it's fuzzy, mapping is robust to the source and PDF not being character-identical, but it isn't infallible: low-confidence matches surface as Unmatched for a one-click manual re-link rather than guessing.

Items the token matcher can't place get two rescue tiers before landing in Unmatched, both marking their results for the Needs review group rather than silently trusting them:

  1. Semantic (opt-in): embed source paragraphs and the anchor with a local Ollama model and link by cosine similarity — catches paraphrased remarks. Embeddings are batched and cached, so re-maps don't re-embed.
  2. Lexical (on by default, zero setup): character-trigram similarity against source paragraphs — catches inflected, hyphen-mangled, or typo'd wording that token overlap misses.

Reports

Export Review Report writes a Markdown report for the active mapping — grouped into Open / Needs review / Unmatched / Resolved with comments, line numbers and notes — ready to send back to that editor. It goes to the round's folder (.eddie/…/rev-2/acme-copyedit.review.md) unless eddieDoc.reportOutput says otherwise, and the sidecar records it as an artifact. Also available headless via node dist/cli.js book.pdf book.adoc --report.

With several editors on one round, export once per mapping: each report covers one editor's marks and your answers to them, which is what that editor needs back.

Replying, and keeping annotations across a rebuild

Asciidoctor has no concept of PDF annotations, so every rebuild starts from a blank page and the editor's marks are gone. Two features close that loop.

Reply threads

Each annotation appears as a threaded comment in the gutter beside the line it maps to: the editor's mark is the root post, your replies sit underneath. The editor's mark is read-only — it came from the PDF — while replies are yours to edit and delete. Replies live in the sidecar under state.replies, so they are committed with the manuscript and survive re-mapping. Set eddieDoc.authorName to control the name on them (it defaults to your git user.name).

Stamping a freshly generated PDF

Eddie Doc: Stamp Reviewed PDF — or eddie-doc stamp in a build script — writes the marks and your replies into a newly rendered PDF as real PDF annotations, producing <name>.reviewed.pdf beside the clean render. The clean render is never modified, so the file you deliver can't accidentally ship with review markup on it.

asciidoctor-pdf -o build/ch04.pdf src/ch04.adoc

# one round, one editor
node dist/cli.js stamp build/ch04.pdf \
  --review .eddie/src/ch04/rev-2/acme-copyedit.review.json

# every editor's marks from the current round, on one PDF
node dist/cli.js stamp build/ch04.pdf \
  --review .eddie/src/ch04/rev-2/acme-copyedit.review.json \
  --review .eddie/src/ch04/rev-2/beta-proofread.review.json

stamp takes any number of --review sidecars and writes them all into one PDF, so a round that came back from several places goes back out as a single marked-up file. Each sidecar names its own source, so the CLI finds the right .adoc wherever the sidecar lives.

Positions are re-derived from the current source text, never from the stored geometry — that described a PDF which no longer exists. Repagination, a font change or a theme tweak are therefore irrelevant. Where the words the editor marked have since been rewritten, the mark degrades to the paragraph and says so in its comment rather than silently claiming she marked text she never saw. Anything that can't be placed is reported, never guessed at.

Durable source anchors

A line number is a guess about a document that is going to change. A marker is the binding. Eddie Doc writes invisible // eddie:<id> markers above annotated blocks, and from then on a mark resolves an identity instead of searching for wording that may no longer exist.

Anchoring happens when a PDF is mapped (eddieDoc.autoAnchor, on by default). That is deliberate: import is the one moment your source still resembles what the editor read, so it is the only moment matching can be trusted. A marker then travels with its paragraph through anything — your own rewrites, a sed, a git merge, an agent pass — and if the paragraph is deleted the marker goes with it, which is the correct outcome. Asciidoctor strips // comments before rendering, so a marker can never reach the PDF or the file you deliver: the marked and unmarked sources render byte-identical text.

If agents edit your manuscript, tell them about the markers: docs/MANUSCRIPT-CLAUDE.md is a block to paste into the CLAUDE.md of your manuscript repo. An agent that strips anchors breaks nothing visible — the damage only appears at the next re-map.

The edit is applied as one undoable action and saved immediately, because a sidecar that references markers missing from the file would be worse than no anchors at all. If you had unsaved changes, the markers are left dirty for you to save — your work is not committed on your behalf. Eddie Doc: Anchor Annotations in Source does the same thing on demand (for mappings made before this was automatic, or with autoAnchor off), and Remove Source Anchors — or eddie-doc strip — takes them out again. Figures and tables need no marker: they anchor to the [#id] you already give them.

When a mark stops describing its text

Re-matching an established link can only make it worse. The matcher compares the editor's original PDF wording against your source as it is now, so once you have rewritten the marked sentence, the strongest remaining candidate is some other paragraph that still shares its vocabulary — and moving the mark there is a confident wrong answer. So an established link is defended, not recomputed:

What holds the markOn every re-map
A line you picked (Re-link)never re-searched
A marker in the textresolved, not searched
A link you vouched for (Confirm Match)never re-searched
An automatic linkre-searched, but only moved by a match at least as good
No link yetsearched freely — nothing to lose

When nothing holds any more — the anchor stops resolving, or the best match is materially worse than the one it would replace — the item keeps its last known place and is marked stale: it appears under Needs review with stale on the row, the editor's original words in the tooltip, and a warning naming how many went stale. Nothing relocates quietly. Confirm Match or Re-link clears the flag once you have decided whether the remark still applies.

The review sidecar (.review.json)

The sidecar is a portable, versioned, tool-agnostic file you can commit and diff. One file describes one mapping: which round it belongs to, whose marks they are, what kind of PDF they came from, and — per item — the PDF-derived annotation, the matcher's mapping and your review state, in separate blocks. Paths are relative to the sidecar and content hashes let a consumer detect stale inputs. It's specified as a small standard so a CLI, CI gate, or another editor can read it:

# validate every mapping in the project against the schema
npx ajv-cli validate --spec=draft2020 --strict=false \
  -s schema/review-v3.schema.json -d ".eddie/**/*.review.json"

Because each file names its own revision and mapping, the review history reconstructs from the files alone — there is no index to keep in sync, and a sidecar stays readable if you move it.

Version 1 and 2 sidecars are migrated transparently on first write; a v2 file becomes the sole mapping of rev-1.

Development

npm install
npm run build          # bundle with esbuild -> dist/
npm run typecheck      # tsc --noEmit
npm test               # mocha unit tests
npm run bench          # matching-quality gate against sample/*.golden.json

# Prove extraction + mapping outside VS Code:
node dist/cli.js <annotated.pdf> <source.adoc> [--json|--report] [--lexical]

# Regenerate the sample fixture (needs asciidoctor-pdf + python3 PyMuPDF):
asciidoctor-pdf -o sample/chapter-01.pdf sample/chapter-01.adoc
python3 sample/annotate.py sample/chapter-01.pdf sample/chapter-01.annotated.pdf

Press F5 (Run Extension) to launch an Extension Development Host with the sample/ folder open.

Layout

src/
  pdf/extract.ts        annotation + positioned-text extraction (pdfjs)
  matching/normalize.ts AsciiDoc-aware text normalization
  matching/fuzzyMatch.ts sliding-window similarity → source line span
  matching/align.ts     stripped text → exact raw char offsets (precise edits)
  matching/mapper.ts    annotations + source → review items (+ round carry-over)
  matching/lexical.ts   char-trigram rescue tier for unmatched items
  matching/semantic.ts  optional Ollama-embedding rescue tier (batched, cached)
  model/types.ts        domain model (revisions, mappings, items)
  model/layout.ts       where review artifacts live (the .eddie tree)
  model/format.ts       the portable on-disk sidecar standard (v3, reads v1/v2)
  model/store.ts        mappings per document + diffable sidecar persistence
  model/report.ts       Markdown review-report renderer
  benchmark/            golden-corpus matching-quality gate (npm run bench)
  ui/treeProvider.ts    activity-bar tree
  ui/decorations.ts     inline line markers + hovers
  ui/diagnostics.ts     Problems-panel entries
  ui/codeActions.ts     lightbulb Quick Fixes
  ui/precise.ts         resolve exact edit ranges/positions in the document
  util.ts               AsciiDoc document detection
  extension.ts          activation, commands, wiring
  cli.ts                standalone extraction/mapping harness
  test/                 mocha unit tests (normalize / fuzzy / mapper)

Roadmap

  • One-click Quick Fixes that apply strikethrough deletions / replacement text. ✅ shipped — see the lightbulb on any annotated line.
  • Precise character-level (not line-level) replacement application. ✅ shipped — strikeouts delete exact words, replace/insert hit exact offsets.
  • Several rounds of edits, each with several annotated PDFs from different editors, stored outside the manuscript folder. ✅ shipped — see Rounds and mappings.
  • Multi-file books (resolve include:: back to the right chapter file).
  • Open the PDF page beside the source for side-by-side review.
  • Ink / shape annotations (positional only).

License

MIT

For plugin developers

Search results and similarity scores are powered by semantic analysis of your plugin's README. If your plugin isn't appearing for searches you'd expect, try updating your README to clearly describe your plugin's purpose, features, and use cases.